<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An SLD Marketing Puzzle</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/07/08/an-sld-marketing-puzzle/</link>
	<description>Self-Experimentation, Scientific Method, the Shangri-La Diet, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/07/08/an-sld-marketing-puzzle/#comment-25396</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/07/08/an-sld-marketing-puzzle/#comment-25396</guid>
					<description>Yes, it is plotted on a log scale. When counts are plotted on square root or log scales, the variability is usually constant with changes in level -- one of the big reasons for the transformation. This data violates that expectation.

If it were plotted on a "raw" (untransformed) scale, the reduction in variability would still be obvious because the pre-interview values cover such a wide range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is plotted on a log scale. When counts are plotted on square root or log scales, the variability is usually constant with changes in level &#8212; one of the big reasons for the transformation. This data violates that expectation.</p>
<p>If it were plotted on a &#8220;raw&#8221; (untransformed) scale, the reduction in variability would still be obvious because the pre-interview values cover such a wide range.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/07/08/an-sld-marketing-puzzle/#comment-25390</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 17:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/07/08/an-sld-marketing-puzzle/#comment-25390</guid>
					<description>It looks like you have this plotted on some sort of log scale.  If you take it off that scale, my guess is there isn't much decrease in variability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you have this plotted on some sort of log scale.  If you take it off that scale, my guess is there isn&#8217;t much decrease in variability.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
