<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Evidence for the Aquatic Ape Theory</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/</link>
	<description>Self-Experimentation, Scientific Method, the Shangri-La Diet, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-97324</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-97324</guid>
					<description>Whales dominate in the sense that they are huge and eat others but are not themselves eaten. Top of the food chain, in other words. Similar for dolphins. They eat a vast number of fish that cannot eat them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whales dominate in the sense that they are huge and eat others but are not themselves eaten. Top of the food chain, in other words. Similar for dolphins. They eat a vast number of fish that cannot eat them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Marc Verhaegen</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-96702</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-96702</guid>
					<description>For recent discussions &#38; links on AAT, please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT or google "aquarboreal".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For recent discussions &amp; links on AAT, please go to <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AAT</a> or google &#8220;aquarboreal&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Varangy</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-60789</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-60789</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;When I watched Planet Earth, I was impressed that the most &lt;b&gt;successful&lt;/b&gt; aquatic animals were mammals (whales and dolphins). Fish had had a huge head start. Mammals such as whales and dolphins had moved back into the water after long evolution on land. Something promoted by terrestrial evolution allowed them to &lt;b&gt;dominate&lt;/b&gt; their new world. That “something” is probably learning ability, although research on whale learning has yet to be done.&lt;/i&gt;

I think you are subjectively anthropomorphizing.  Define what you mean by &lt;i&gt;sucessful&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;dominate&lt;/i&gt;.  It is not clear to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When I watched Planet Earth, I was impressed that the most <b>successful</b> aquatic animals were mammals (whales and dolphins). Fish had had a huge head start. Mammals such as whales and dolphins had moved back into the water after long evolution on land. Something promoted by terrestrial evolution allowed them to <b>dominate</b> their new world. That “something” is probably learning ability, although research on whale learning has yet to be done.</i></p>
<p>I think you are subjectively anthropomorphizing.  Define what you mean by <i>sucessful</i> and <i>dominate</i>.  It is not clear to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: new evidence in favor of the (exceedingly awesome) aquatic ape theory &#171; Onwards and Forwards</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-59833</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/11/04/new-evidence-for-the-aquatic-ape-theory/#comment-59833</guid>
					<description>[...] new evidence in favor of the (exceedingly awesome) aquatic ape&#160;theory Filed under: evolution, science &#8212; eenauk @ 14:39   Ok this has nothing to do with ethics or religion, but i&#8217;m a big fan of the aquatic ape theory. Seth points us to new evidence from the University of Arizona that our ancestors were coaxed by watery ways into the beginnings of human evolution. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] new evidence in favor of the (exceedingly awesome) aquatic ape&nbsp;theory Filed under: evolution, science &#8212; eenauk @ 14:39   Ok this has nothing to do with ethics or religion, but i&#8217;m a big fan of the aquatic ape theory. Seth points us to new evidence from the University of Arizona that our ancestors were coaxed by watery ways into the beginnings of human evolution. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
