<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University)</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/</link>
	<description>Self-Experimentation, Scientific Method, the Shangri-La Diet, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: PJ Eby</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-265845</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-265845</guid>
					<description>FYI, a response from the OHRP is here:

http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/news/recentnews.html#20080115

They seem to be saying that as long as you're not *researching* whether checklists actually WORK, it's okay to just go ahead and USE them.  Which seems a bit weird, but oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, a response from the OHRP is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/news/recentnews.html#20080115" rel="nofollow">http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/news/recentnews.html#20080115</a></p>
<p>They seem to be saying that as long as you&#8217;re not *researching* whether checklists actually WORK, it&#8217;s okay to just go ahead and USE them.  Which seems a bit weird, but oh well.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Royce Fessenden</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-202775</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-202775</guid>
					<description>I'm stunned at David Hunter's comment that elevates an administrative procedure to the same level as "medical research".  This is the same type of medieval madness that objected to doctors washing their hands and cleaning up the bloody surgeons gowns.

Who will protect us from the "ethics" protectors!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m stunned at David Hunter&#8217;s comment that elevates an administrative procedure to the same level as &#8220;medical research&#8221;.  This is the same type of medieval madness that objected to doctors washing their hands and cleaning up the bloody surgeons gowns.</p>
<p>Who will protect us from the &#8220;ethics&#8221; protectors!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-103274</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-103274</guid>
					<description>Seth I don't see the problem here.

Why did John Hopkins not simply apply for approval before they began what was clearly research?

You seem to be siding with Hopkins because it worked, but what if it hadn't? What if their experiments had negative effects, would you then be condemning them? The job of research ethics committees is to ensure research is carried out ethically, and I don't see how bypassing them is laudable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth I don&#8217;t see the problem here.</p>
<p>Why did John Hopkins not simply apply for approval before they began what was clearly research?</p>
<p>You seem to be siding with Hopkins because it worked, but what if it hadn&#8217;t? What if their experiments had negative effects, would you then be condemning them? The job of research ethics committees is to ensure research is carried out ethically, and I don&#8217;t see how bypassing them is laudable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: links for 2008-01-04 &#171; Matthew Henty</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-99108</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-99108</guid>
					<description>[...] Seth’s blog » Blog Archive » Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) (tags: bureaucracy healthcare ethics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Seth’s blog » Blog Archive » Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) (tags: bureaucracy healthcare ethics) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Seth&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anti-Depressants, Suicide, and a Malfunctioning Legal System</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-97946</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-97946</guid>
					<description>[...] Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: sysrick.com &#187; links for 2008-01-01</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-97873</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 23:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2007/12/31/academic-horror-story-johns-hopkins-edition/#comment-97873</guid>
					<description>[...] Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Academic Horror Story (Johns Hopkins University) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
