<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Bruce Gray, Web-Savvy Sculptor (part 3)</title>
	<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/07/28/interview-with-bruce-gray-web-savvy-sculptor-part-3/</link>
	<description>Self-Experimentation, Scientific Method, the Shangri-La Diet, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Nadav</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/07/28/interview-with-bruce-gray-web-savvy-sculptor-part-3/#comment-198761</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/07/28/interview-with-bruce-gray-web-savvy-sculptor-part-3/#comment-198761</guid>
					<description>Awesome interview.

Can anyone confirm what Bruce said re "That's why everybody uses Google now."  Is it really mostly because Yahoo! makes the most logical top search results pay for the privilege of occupying the top spot?

I'm an investment analyst, and in my experience it's almost unheard of for a company that does no advertising and enjoys no obvious barriers to entry to have such a dominant market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome interview.</p>
<p>Can anyone confirm what Bruce said re &#8220;That&#8217;s why everybody uses Google now.&#8221;  Is it really mostly because Yahoo! makes the most logical top search results pay for the privilege of occupying the top spot?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an investment analyst, and in my experience it&#8217;s almost unheard of for a company that does no advertising and enjoys no obvious barriers to entry to have such a dominant market share.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
